Jennifer Aniston's Just Not That Into Her Movie's Title
I love this cover of New York Times Magazine! Honestly, I think it's the best magazine shot I've seen of Jennifer Aniston yet.
Though Jen is everywhere promoting her new movie with Owen Wilson, Marley & Me, she took time out to say that she'd like to change the title of another project she's been working on.
"I wish it was She's Just Not That Into You!" she tells the mag of the flick she's starring in with Ben Affleck. "Unfortunately, it's He's Just Not That Into You. The other would be more empowering."
Yeah, yeah, whatever.
I actually thought the excerpt about her watching old Friends episodes was much more interesting.
"There are times I don't even remember that particular show," she admits. "This is horrible to say, but there are times when I laugh my rear end off," she says. "And I get in debates with people who are over and say, 'Friends' is not my thing.' Excuse you!"
How funny. I would love to watch an episode or two with her. Like the one where she dresses up as a cheerleader to get noticed by "Joshua", and winds up giving herself a fat lip. Or the "when were you under me?" episode. Classic.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Jennifer Aniston's Just Not That Into Her Movie's Title.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://dailyblabber.ivillage.com/system/mt-tb.cgi/13115


Sad that she has to throw "Friends" in there. That show is as done and is as old as her marriage to Brad. You don't see Ang saying "oh yes, I watch "lara croft" all the time. Nope, because she can get attention for her CURRENT work not some crap from 10 years ago. Moving right along!
HELLoise~ Do you not think that maybe the reporter asked her about "Friends"?? And maybe she was just being polite and answering the questions?? And anyway 'Friends' was WAY WAY WAY bigger than "Lara Croft" could have ever hoped to be. So No i wouldn't expect anyone to even remember that movie, like they would "Friends". People ask Ang about 'Mr. and Mrs. Smith' all the time. And thats an old movie, BUT it was an important one in Ang and Brads life, like 'Friends' was in Jennifer's.
Love this pic of Jen and love Jen. HELLoise...it's obvious you'll try to find anything to pick on Jen about..."Ang" has talked about plenty of things she should just shut up about, so do us all a favor and stop bringing up Ang when there is absolutely no correlation between this article and her. (By the way, you 2 must be awfully close..I mean you referring to her as Ang and all makes it kind of obvious or just pathetic.)
MelissaJ, people, am glad we all realise that reporters ask them questions and they respond back (that is for those of you who keep accusing Ang, yes Ang of "blabbing" to the world). That said, Jen totally rocks the cover of the mag.
OMG!!!!jennifer look teriible in this cover...she seem want to look like angie but she not up to that level.Please sick of jen aniston she is a loser and she desprate women who need help.No woner brad run away so as John mayer ...wait and see. She is mad and really disgusting women.
I'd like to say that I care what ya'll think, but I don't. Jen...I mean JENNIFER is boring!!! He's just not that into you...kinda prophetic huh?
HELLoise, the fans of Jennifer Aniston loves her..so we don't really care what you think about her also. Fair enough?? :)
Prophetic would mean it hasn't happened yet and, as people so love to remind us, Jennifer has already been left by Brad. A prophecy to predict the past would be pretty pointless. I love her, but Jennifer looks horrible on that cover. Even so, certainly not as terrible as Angelina usually looks, Sanny, so it's not a fair comparsion. Angelina looks like a scary vampire rat without even trying. Jennifer has to make a bizzare face to look bad.
I think the pic on the cover of this magazine is great!! All you haters need to get a life!!
I agree with "whatever" about Angelina's look, and try to guess, how long else that Ms. Horror occupy magazines covers/pages... Seing her mask means bud luck ... Yet, Jen have great stage and screen potentials.